“The Mid-day meal scheme has helped reduce caste prejudices among students and…

2023

“The Mid-day meal scheme has helped reduce caste prejudices among students and promoted social justice.” Explain the statement by choosing the correct option.

A. Children of all castes eat together.
B. In many places, Dalit women are employed to cook meals.
C. Enrolment of poor children in schools has increased many times.
D. Reduced the dropout rates in schools.

  1. A.

    A, B and D

  2. B.

    A, C and D

  3. C.

    A, B, C and D

  4. D.

    A, B and C

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: C

A government welfare-in-education scheme's contribution to reducing prejudice against a social group and advancing social justice can be traced along several distinct dimensions: a change in everyday social behaviour (who interacts with whom), a change in economic standing or dignity for members of that group, and a widening of access to schooling — who enrols and who stays enrolled. Explaining how a specific scheme achieves this means identifying which of these dimensions its documented, on-the-ground effects actually reach.

  • Serving the same meal to children of every caste, seated together, breaks the practice of caste-based commensality that sustains untouchability — a change in everyday social behaviour.

  • Employing Dalit women as cooks in many places gives them dignified, paid work and normalises food prepared by them for children of every caste, directly challenging food-purity-based prejudice — a change in economic standing.

  • The scheme's food incentive is credited with a large rise in enrolment of poor and first-generation children, widening who gets access to school.

  • The same incentive is also linked to lower dropout rates, widening who stays in school once enrolled.

For the Mid-day Meal Scheme, all four of these effects are separately documented, and together they span behaviour, economic standing, and access — so a complete explanation of the statement draws on all four rather than a subset of them.

  • A set built only from the behavioural, economic-standing, and retention effects still leaves out the scheme's separately documented role in pulling more poor children into school in the first place.

  • A set built from the behavioural, enrolment, and retention effects, without the employment effect, misses the change in economic standing that most directly confronts caste-based food-purity prejudice.

  • A set built from the behavioural, employment, and enrolment effects, without the retention effect, treats getting children into school as the whole story, when keeping them there is a separately documented outcome.

Only the option that draws on all four effects together — shared meals across castes, dignified employment for Dalit women, higher enrolment, and lower dropout — gives the complete explanation of how the Mid-day Meal Scheme reduces caste prejudice and promotes social justice.

Explore the full course: Uptet Paper 2

Loading lesson…