Assertion (A): In an inclusive classroom, adaptations should be made in…
2024
Assertion (A):
In an inclusive classroom, adaptations should be made in learning goals, pedagogical strategies as well as assessment.
Reason (R):
The philosophy of inclusion advocates elimination of all individual differences through pedagogical approaches and assessment.
Choose the correct option:
- A.
Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
- B.
Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
- C.
(A) is true but (R) is false.
- D.
Both (A) and (R) are false.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
Inclusive education is the pedagogical approach of designing a classroom so that every learner — regardless of ability, background, or learning style — can access the same curriculum. Because learners differ, an inclusive classroom differentiates: it adapts learning goals, pedagogical strategies, and assessment methods to meet varied needs, rather than expecting every learner to fit one fixed approach.
Applying this to the assertion and reason: the assertion — that goals, pedagogical strategies, and assessment should all be adapted in an inclusive classroom — is a direct statement of this differentiation principle, so it holds true. The reason, however, claims that the philosophy of inclusion is to eliminate all individual differences through these very adaptations. That is not what differentiation is for: goals, strategies, and assessment are adapted precisely because learners differ, in order to accommodate and value that diversity, not to erase it. So the reason misstates the philosophy of inclusion and cannot explain why the assertion is true.
Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A) — this treats the elimination-of-differences claim as both true and as the reason adaptations are made; since that claim misstates the purpose of inclusion, this reading fails on both counts.
Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A) — this still accepts the elimination claim as an accurate description of inclusive philosophy, only disputing that it explains the assertion; the claim itself is inaccurate, not merely non-explanatory.
(A) is true but (R) is false — adapting goals, strategies, and assessment is standard inclusive practice (so the assertion holds), while the claim that inclusion eliminates individual differences misrepresents its actual philosophy (so the reason does not hold).
Both (A) and (R) are false — this would require adapting goals, strategies, and assessment for diverse learners to be an inaccurate description of inclusive classrooms, which contradicts a foundational, well-documented practice of inclusive education.
Since the assertion is true and the reason is false, the correct evaluation is: (A) is true but (R) is false.