Identify the correct statement about reliability and validity. (A) Reliability…
2024
Identify the correct statement about reliability and validity.
(A) Reliability measures consistency
(B) Validity measures accuracy
(C) Reliability also ensures validity
(D) Inter-rater reliability is used to compare results between different studies
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Answer: B. (A), (B) only — Concept — reliability is the consistency of a measurement: the same instrument, applied to the same object under the same conditions, returns the same result.…
- A.
(A), (B), (C) only
- B.
(A), (B) only
- C.
(B), (C), (D) only
- D.
(A), (B), (D) only
Attempted by 4 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B
Concept — reliability is the consistency of a measurement: the same instrument, applied to the same object under the same conditions, returns the same result. Validity is the accuracy of a measurement: the instrument actually captures the construct it claims to capture. Reliability is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for validity — a measure cannot be accurate while fluctuating at random, yet perfect steadiness alone never proves that the right thing is being measured.
Concept — inter-rater reliability is one type of reliability. It is the degree of agreement between two or more independent raters, observers, or coders who score the same set of subjects, responses, or artefacts within a single study. It is quantified with statistics such as Cohen's kappa, Fleiss' kappa, or the intraclass correlation coefficient, all of which are computed over ratings of a shared body of material.
Application — each statement in the stem is checked against those two definitions:
Reliability measures consistency — this restates the definition of reliability, so it stands.
Validity measures accuracy — this restates the definition of validity, so it stands.
Reliability also ensures validity — this inverts the necessary-but-not-sufficient relationship, treating a necessary condition as a guarantee, so it does not stand.
Inter-rater reliability is used to compare results between different studies — this transfers a within-study index of agreement among raters onto comparison across studies, so it does not stand.
Cross-check — the classic counterexample settles the sufficiency question: a weighing scale that is mis-calibrated by exactly five kilograms returns the same reading every time, so it is perfectly reliable, yet every reading is wrong, so it is entirely invalid. Consistency therefore cannot guarantee accuracy. Conversely, a measure that varies at random cannot be accurate, which is why reliability remains necessary. On scope, kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient require the same items rated by each rater; comparing findings across separate studies is instead the work of replication and meta-analysis.
Result — only the consistency statement and the accuracy statement survive; the correct combination is (A), (B) only.