Knowledge is arrived at through the gathering of facts that provide the basis…

Answer: Inductivism

Explanation: Inductivism (inductive reasoning) is the method of deriving general laws or principles from the systematic collection of specific facts and observations. The question describes arriving at knowledge by gathering facts that form the basis for laws, which matches this inductive process.

• Why this fits: Collect observations → identify patterns → formulate general laws (induction).

• Why the choice labeled "Deducitivism" is incorrect: Deductive reasoning goes from general laws to specific predictions or conclusions, the reverse of the process described.

• Why the choice labeled "Constructionism" is incorrect: Constructionism emphasizes knowledge as constructed by individuals or societies rather than specifically describing the method of forming laws from collected facts.

• Why the choice labeled "Objectivism" is incorrect: Objectivism concerns the existence of objective reality or truths, not the procedural method of inducing laws from observations.

Tip: Remember that induction builds general rules from examples, while deduction applies general rules to particular cases.