In the struggle for India’s independence, few movements were as powerful as…
2026
In the struggle for India’s independence, few movements were as powerful as the Salt Satyagraha. Led by Mahatma Gandhi in 1930, this nonviolent protest was a direct challenge to British rule and their oppressive salt laws. At the time, the British controlled the production and taxation of salt, making it illegal for Indians to collect or sell it. This simple necessity became a symbol of colonial exploitation, and Gandhi decided to resist.
On 12 March 1930, Gandhi, along with 78 followers, set out on a 240-mile march from his ashram in Sabarmati to the coastal village of Dandi. As they walked, thousands joined them, transforming the march into a national movement. On 6 April, Gandhi reached the seashore and picked up a handful of salt—defying British law. This act of civil disobedience sparked mass protests across India, with people making and selling salt illegally.
The British responded with brutal force, arresting over 60,000 people, including Gandhi himself. But the movement had already shaken the empire. The Salt Satyagraha proved that nonviolence could be a powerful weapon against oppression and inspired freedom struggles worldwide. It was a turning point in India's journey to independence.
Q. What is the overall tone of the passage?
- A.
Inspirational and reflective
- B.
Angry and confrontational
- C.
Indifferent and detached
- D.
Humorous and lighthearted
Attempted by 5 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: A
Detailed Solution
Analysis of the Tone: The tone is defined by the author's choice of language when describing the movement's impact.
Inspirational Elements:
The passage highlights the Salt Satyagraha as a "powerful weapon against oppression".
It notes that the movement "inspired freedom struggles worldwide," which conveys an uplifting and motivational quality.
Reflective Elements:
The author characterizes the event as a "turning point in India’s journey to independence," indicating a retrospective look at the historical significance of the protest.
Why other options are incorrect:
The passage avoids an "angry and confrontational" tone by focusing on nonviolent resistance rather than hostility.
It is not "indifferent and detached" because it describes the significant consequences and brutality faced by participants.
It is not "humorous and lighthearted" as the subject matter deals with serious topics such as oppression and mass arrests.