Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follow : The idea…
2023
Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follow :
The idea of power-sharing has emerged in opposition to the notions of undivided political power. For a long time, it was believed that all power of a government must reside in one person or group of persons located at one place. It was felt that if the power to decide is dispersed, it would not be possible to take quick decisions and to enforce them. But these notions have changed with the emergence of democracy. One basic principle of democracy is that people are the source of all political power. In a democracy, people rule themselves through institutions of self-government. In a good democratic government, due respect is given to diverse groups and views that exist in a society. Everyone has a voice in the shaping of public policies. Therefore, it follows that in a democracy, political power should be distributed among as many citizens as possible. In modern democracies, power sharing arrangements can take many forms. Let us look at some of the most common arrangements that we have or will come across. Power is shared among different organs of government, such as the legislature, executive and judiciary. Let us call this horizontal distribution of power because it allows different organs of government placed at the same level to exercise different powers. Such a separation ensures that none of the organs can exercise unlimited power. Each organ checks the others. This results in a balance of power among various institutions. Last year, we studied that in a democracy, even though ministers and government officials exercise power, they are responsible to the Parliament or State Assemblies. Similarly, although judges are appointed by the executive, they can check the functioning of executive or laws made by the legislatures. This arrangement is called a system of checks and balances. Power can be shared among governments at different levels—a general government for the entire country and governments at the provincial or regional level. Such a general government for the entire country is usually called federal government. In India, we refer to it as the Central or Union Government. The governments at the provincial or regional level are called by different names in different countries.
In India, we call them State Governments. This system is not followed in all countries. There are many countries where there are no provincial or state governments. But in those countries like ours, where there are different levels of government, the Constitution clearly lays down the powers of different levels of government. This is what they did in Belgium, but was refused in Sri Lanka. This is called federal division of power.
The same principle can be extended to levels of government lower than the State Government, such as the Municipality and Panchayat. Let us call division of power involving higher and lower levels of government vertical division of power. Power may also be shared among different social groups, such as the religious and linguistic groups. ‘Community government’ in Belgium is a good example of this arrangement. In some countries, there are constitutional and legal arrangements, whereby socially weaker sections and women are represented in the legislatures and administration. Last year, we studied the system of ‘reserved constituencies’ in assemblies and the parliament of our country. This type of arrangement is meant to give space in the government and administration to diverse social groups, who otherwise, would feel alienated from the government. This method is used to give minority communities a fair share in power. Power sharing arrangements can also be seen in the way political parties, pressure groups and movements control or influence those in power. In a democracy, the citizens must have freedom to choose among various contenders for power. In contemporary democracies, this takes the form of competition among different parties. Such competition ensures that power does not remain in one hand. In the long run, power is shared among different political parties that represent different ideologies and social groups. Sometimes this kind of sharing can be direct, when two or more parties form an alliance to contest elections. If their alliance is elected, they form a coalition government and thus share power. In a democracy, we find interest groups, such as those of traders, businessmen, industrialists, farmers and industrial workers. They also will have a share in governmental power, either through participation in governmental committees or bringing influence on the decision-making process.
According to the passage, who is identified as the source of all political power in a democracy?
Answer: A. People are in power — CONCEPTDemocracy is founded on popular sovereignty: political authority originates with the people, while public institutions exercise that authority on their…
- A.
People are in power
- B.
Political parties are in power
- C.
Only one ruler is in power
- D.
More than one of the above
- E.
None of the above
Attempted by 1 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: A
CONCEPT
Democracy is founded on popular sovereignty: political authority originates with the people, while public institutions exercise that authority on their behalf.
Power-sharing distributes the exercise of authority among institutions and groups; it does not replace citizens as the ultimate source of that authority.
APPLICATION
Locate the sentence that defines the principle rather than the later examples of power-sharing.
The passage states that people are the source of all political power and that they rule through institutions of self-government.
Thus the institution or group exercising power must be distinguished from the citizens from whom democratic authority originates.
CONTRAST
Political parties are contenders for governmental power and may share it through coalitions; the passage does not make parties the source of democratic authority.
Only one ruler is in power describes the older notion of undivided political power that the passage contrasts with democracy.
More than one of the above combines descriptions that the passage assigns different roles, so it does not express one basic democratic principle.
None of the above conflicts with the passage's explicit statement of the principle.
CROSS-CHECK
The passage consistently makes ministers, officials, parties, and institutions accountable to or dependent on citizens. That relationship confirms popular sovereignty as the governing idea.
Therefore, people are in power.