Which of the following is not an objective of peace education?

Concept: Peace education is the planned cultivation of the knowledge, attitudes, values and skills through which people handle conflict without violence and build just, cooperative relationships. Its defining orientation is universal: it widens a learner's circle of concern outward from the self and the immediate group towards humanity as a whole. So any aim it adopts must be a good that all people can hold in common; an aim tied to one group's separate advantage falls outside it, because narrow and exclusive loyalties are exactly what peace education sets out to dissolve.

Application: Apply that test to each aim offered here. The survival of the species, freedom from fear and armed threat, and growth in human capability and well-being are all goods of the common kind: none of them can be secured for one group while being denied to others, and all three appear in the standard statements of what peace education is for. Peace for regionalism is an aim of the opposite kind, because it attaches peace to the separate claims of one's own region. Peace education treats regionalism as a divisive attachment and a cause of conflict that learners should be helped to move beyond, not as a goal to be pursued.

Contrast: Comparing the four aims by what each one asks for makes the distinction explicit:

Result: Peace for regionalism is therefore the aim that is not an objective of peace education.