According to the passage, which of the following can cause buildings to “sink…
2024
According to the passage, which of the following can cause buildings to “sink out of sight” during an earthquake?
Answer: C. Shaking of water-saturated soil — Concept: A detail question of the “according to the passage” type is settled by the text alone — never by outside knowledge, and never by whichever process…
- A.
Tsunamis
- B.
Creep
- C.
Shaking of water-saturated soil
- D.
Soil expansion
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
Concept: A detail question of the “according to the passage” type is settled by the text alone — never by outside knowledge, and never by whichever process sounds most destructive. The reading method is fixed:
Locate the sentence that states the exact effect the question quotes.
Read the cause the writer ties to that sentence — the link is usually carried by a pointer phrase such as “under these conditions”, “this”, or “because of that”.
Application: Applying that method to this passage:
The stated effect closes the passage — “Buildings sometimes sink out of sight or fall down like a row of dominoes under these conditions.”
The pointer “under these conditions” looks back at the sentence immediately before it: “Water-saturated soil can liquefy when shaken.”
So the cause the passage attaches to buildings sinking out of sight is the shaking of water-saturated soil, whose grains lose contact with one another so that the ground briefly behaves like a fluid and can no longer carry the weight standing on it.
Contrast: the other processes named appear in the passage, or in the subject, in different roles.
Tsunamis — the 2004 Banda Aceh earthquake and tsunami opens the passage as a measure of scale, with a toll above 230,000 and damage reaching as far as Africa; the sinking of buildings is tied by the writer to the behaviour of the ground beneath them, not to wave action.
Creep — the passage defines creep, or seismic slip, as fault movement that is gradual and relatively smooth and may be undetectable to a casual observer; it is contrasted in the same paragraph with the sudden jerk that follows when friction holds the rocks.
Soil expansion — the ground conditions the passage discusses are soft landfill, poorly consolidated soil, and water saturation; the swelling of soil as it absorbs moisture is a process the text never introduces.
Cross-check: the same paragraph explains why Kobe and Mexico City, parts of which stand on soft landfill or poorly consolidated soil, suffer the greatest damage — throughout, the passage locates the worst earthquake damage in the condition of the ground a city stands on rather than in the shaking alone. Answer: shaking of water-saturated soil.