Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follow : Every now…
2024
Read the passage given below and answer the questions that follow :
Every now and then we would speed through a village lined with waving Tibetan children. Their villages looked wonderful and so inviting that Dorje was not showing any signs of slowing down. Small clusters of single and double storey buildings with walk-in courtyards jostled together in the foothills to gain maximum exposure to the sun. The houses looked solid, built for the harsh environment. Walls are made up of stone to waist height and finished off with mud bricks to the roof. Tin cans lined the window ledges, with the bright orange of marigolds in full bloom livening up the black-and-white of the houses.
Branches of trees adorned with colourful prayer flags stood high into the wind from the top of the flat roofs. The auspicious blue, white, red, green and yellow colours of the fabrics stood out against the rich blue of the Tibetan sky. Each prayer flag carries a picture of Lungta, the jewelled dragon horse, who carries the owner’s prayers up to the divine every time the flag flaps in the wind.
The larger villages have healthy trees, usually willows or poplars which look quite out of place in the generally treeless landscape. Wood is a precious commodity in the highland areas of Tibet and is never wasted. The few shrubs which grow wild on the hillsides are harvested for use as brushwood and each courtyard wall is piled high with sticks gathered from the mountains to get a fire started. The lack of solid fuel in the shape of wood is not a problem for the Tibetans, who have an ingenious wood substitute : yak dung.
Why do the willows and poplars look absurd in the landscape ?
- A.
They are stunted shrubs.
- B.
They have minimum branches and leaves.
- C.
Because the landscape is generally treeless.
- D.
The other trees camouflage them.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
Concept: A literal-comprehension question asks you to locate the exact reason or detail the passage itself states — the correct choice restates a cause-effect or descriptive relationship given directly in the text, not something inferred or brought in from outside knowledge.
Application: The passage says the willows and poplars are “healthy trees … which look quite out of place in the generally treeless landscape.” This sentence directly pairs the effect (looking out of place, i.e. absurd) with its stated cause: the landscape around them generally has no trees. So the reason they look absurd is that the surrounding landscape is generally treeless.
Contrast:
“They are stunted shrubs” confuses the willows/poplars with the wild hillside shrubs the passage separately describes as brushwood — the text calls the willows/poplars healthy trees, not shrubs.
“They have minimum branches and leaves” is never stated in the passage at all.
“The other trees camouflage them” is not supported either — the passage never describes any surrounding trees or a camouflage effect.
Result: Only the treeless-landscape reason is the one the passage itself gives.