Which of the following statement(s) is/are true about wire framing of website?…

A wireframe is the skeletal blueprint stage of UX/UI design: before any colour, typography, or imagery is decided, a wireframe deliberately strips a page down to structure — it defines WHAT content sits WHERE on a page, and HOW a user moves BETWEEN pages (the site's navigation / information architecture).

Applying this to the two statements: Statement I describes exactly the content-placement role of a wireframe — showing which content block appears on which page. Statement II describes the navigation role — showing the links/paths connecting one page to another. A standard wireframe deliverable covers both of these at the same time, so both statements hold.

• “Only I” would hold only if a wireframe stopped at content layout and said nothing about how pages connect — but every standard wireframe also maps navigation, so limiting it to content alone under-describes it.

• “Only II” would hold only if a wireframe were purely a navigation diagram with no content layout at all — but showing which content block sits where is the wireframe's most basic job, so limiting it to navigation alone under-describes it too.

• “Neither I nor II” would require a wireframe to do neither task, which contradicts the very definition of wireframing as a content-and-navigation blueprint.

So both the content-placement function (Statement I) and the navigation-mapping function (Statement II) are genuine, core parts of website wireframing.