What is the Poverty ratio of Tripura in 2011-12?
2023
What is the Poverty ratio of Tripura in 2011-12?
Answer: C. 14.05% — The poverty ratio of a region — formally its head-count ratio (HCR) — is the percentage of that region's population whose monthly per capita consumption…
- A.
14.30%
- B.
14.21%
- C.
14.05%
- D.
None of these
Attempted by 41 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
The poverty ratio of a region — formally its head-count ratio (HCR) — is the percentage of that region's population whose monthly per capita consumption expenditure falls below the poverty line. India's official 2011-12 estimates were published by the Planning Commission in July 2013 using the Tendulkar Committee methodology, which set the line at Rs 816 per capita per month in rural areas and Rs 1,000 per capita per month in urban areas. The rural and urban ratios are estimated separately, and the single figure quoted for a state is their combination, weighted by that state's rural and urban population shares.
Applying this to Tripura, the Planning Commission's state-wise table for 2011-12 records the following, with the all-India numbers alongside for reference:
Segment | Tripura (2011-12) | All-India (2011-12) |
|---|---|---|
Rural | 16.53% | 25.70% |
Urban | 7.42% | 13.70% |
Combined (state figure) | 14.05% | 21.92% |
The state figure the question asks for is the combined row, so the poverty ratio of Tripura in 2011-12 is 14.05%. It sits much closer to the rural value than to the urban one because roughly three-quarters of Tripura's population lived in rural areas at the 2011 Census, so the rural ratio dominates the population-weighted average.
As a cross-check, 14.05% of Tripura's 2011 Census population of 36.74 lakh is about 5.16 lakh people below the poverty line, and the figure is 7.87 percentage points under the all-India ratio of 21.92%. The Government of Tripura's own Economic Review reproduces the same 14.05%.
Two distinctions worth holding on to:
The rural-only 16.53% and the urban-only 7.42% are not the state ratio; the state ratio is their population-weighted combination, and quoting either one in its place is the commonest error made with this data.
Methodologies must not be mixed. The later Rangarajan Committee used a higher poverty line and placed Tripura's 2011-12 combined ratio near 24.9%; that series yields none of the percentages offered here, so the Tendulkar series is the one this question is built on.
Because 14.05% is itself listed among the choices, "None of these" does not apply.