Agra is north of Erode and west of Calcutta. Bombay is north of Agra and west…
2026
Agra is north of Erode and west of Calcutta.
Bombay is north of Agra and west of Faridabad.
Delhi is south and east of Agra.
Erode is north of Faridabad and east of Delhi.
Faridabad is north of Delhi and west of Agra.
Calcutta is south of Faridabad and west of Delhi.
Which of the following statements, if true, would make the information in the numbered statements more specific?
- A.
Calcutta is north of Delhi.
- B.
Erode is north of Delhi
- C.
Agra is east of Bombay.
- D.
Calcutta is east of Faridabad
Attempted by 2 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: A
Concept: In a linear-ordering direction puzzle, plot the towns independently on a north-south scale and an east-west scale using the given clues. Two towns end up with a determined relative order on a scale only when the clues chain them together; if no clue (directly or through a chain) links a pair, their relative order on that scale stays undetermined. An extra statement genuinely "makes the information more specific" only when it fixes such an undetermined pair — restating an order that is already forced by the existing chain adds nothing new.
Application: Statement (2)'s town east of Bombay and the town in statements (4)–(6) are the same place, Faridabad — so all six statements together give clues for six towns: Agra, Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi, Erode, and Faridabad.
North-south scale: statement (2) gives Bombay north of Agra; statement (1) gives Agra north of Erode; statement (4) gives Erode north of Faridabad; statements (5) and (6) place both Delhi and Calcutta south of Faridabad. So the order is Bombay > Agra > Erode > Faridabad > {Delhi, Calcutta} — but nothing fixes whether Delhi or Calcutta lies further north; that pair is the one undetermined relation.
East-west scale: statement (2) gives Bombay west of Faridabad; statement (5) gives Faridabad west of Agra; statement (1) gives Agra west of Calcutta; statements (3) and (6) place Delhi east of Agra and east of Calcutta; statement (4) gives Delhi west of Erode. Chaining these gives the complete order Bombay < Faridabad < Agra < Calcutta < Delhi < Erode — every pair on this scale is already fixed, so there is no gap here.
The only fact that would remove an ambiguity is one that fixes the north-south order between Calcutta and Delhi. "Calcutta is north of Delhi" does exactly that, so it is the statement that makes the given information more specific.
Cross-check: The other statements only restate orders that are already forced by the chain:
"Erode is north of Delhi" — already forced, since Erode is north of Faridabad and Faridabad is north of Delhi.
"Agra is east of Bombay" — already forced, since Bombay is west of Faridabad and Faridabad is west of Agra.
"Calcutta is east of Faridabad" — already forced, since Faridabad is west of Agra and Agra is west of Calcutta.
None of these narrows anything further, confirming that only the Calcutta–Delhi relation was left open.