Consider the following statements regarding ‘Mission Madhuhaari’ in Rajasthan…
2024
Consider the following statements regarding ‘Mission Madhuhaari’ in Rajasthan – (A) It is started to prevent Type-I Diabetes. (B) This program is started under the joint aegis of the Medical and Health Department, National Health Mission and Ford Foundation.
Answer: D. Only statement (A) is correct — ConceptFor a public-health mission, distinguish its target population and service objective from the organisations formally implementing or supporting it. In…
- A.
Only statement (B) is correct
- B.
Both the statements (A) and (B) are incorrect
- C.
Both the statements (A) and (B) are correct
- D.
Only statement (A) is correct
- E.
Question not attempted
Attempted by 55 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: D
Concept
For a public-health mission, distinguish its target population and service objective from the organisations formally implementing or supporting it. In an official-exam item, the commission’s final key is the canonical cross-check after the underlying facts are verified.
Application
Statement (A): Rajasthan’s Medical and Health Department describes Mission Madhuhaari as strengthening healthcare and services for people with Type-1 diabetes, including identification, treatment, insulin access, counselling, and prevention of complications. In the source-exam wording, this is the programme objective represented by statement (A).
Statement (B): The mission is implemented through Rajasthan’s Medical and Health Department and the National Health Mission. Programme material identifies the William J. Clinton Foundation and other partners, not the Ford Foundation; therefore the stated joint-aegis list is not supported.
Cross-check
RPSC’s final answer key for the Programmer (Information Technology and Communication Department) 2024 Paper-I examination, read with the source paper, confirms the value “Only statement (A) is correct.”
Contrast
“Only statement (B) is correct” retains the unsupported partner list and rejects the programme-objective description.
“Both statements are incorrect” overlooks the source commission’s acceptance of statement (A).
“Both statements are correct” accepts the unsupported reference to the Ford Foundation.
“Question not attempted” records no factual selection.
Result
Therefore, only statement (A) is correct.