In developing countries, the fraction of food waste in the composition of…
2020
In developing countries, the fraction of food waste in the composition of municipal solid waste is typically in the range
- A.
10-15%
- B.
20-30%
- C.
25-35%
- D.
Greater than 40%
Attempted by 2 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: D
Municipal solid waste (MSW) composition is closely tied to a country's income level: the organic/biodegradable food-waste share is highest in low- and middle-income economies and declines as income rises, while paper, plastic, glass, and other packaging/recyclable waste rises with income. This happens because wealthier economies consume more processed, packaged goods (inflating the non-organic waste share), whereas lower-income economies rely more on fresh, minimally packaged food, which generates a larger food/organic-waste fraction relative to the total waste stream.
Applying this principle to developing countries specifically: authoritative solid-waste assessments (such as the World Bank's What a Waste 2.0 overview and UNEP/ISWA's Global Waste Management Outlook) consistently report that food and organic/green waste makes up roughly half or more of total municipal solid waste in low- and middle-income countries, with figures in the low-to-mid 50s percent range being typical. That places the developing-country food-waste share well past the 40% mark, so the typical range quoted for developing countries is 'greater than 40%.'
10-15% describes a far smaller slice of the waste stream - closer to what a single non-organic category (such as plastics) contributes in many waste-composition studies, not the food/organic share in developing-country municipal solid waste.
20-30% is closer to the food-waste share more often reported for high-income, heavily packaged waste streams, where paper and plastic waste dilute the organic fraction - not the picture typical of developing countries.
25-35% still falls short of the roughly 50%-or-more organic/food-waste share documented for low- and middle-income countries; it understates how dominant fresh-food waste is in these economies' waste streams.
Because the documented developing-country figure clears 40% by a wide margin, and none of the three lower brackets match that data, the range 'greater than 40%' is the one consistent with the evidence.