Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments…

202420242024

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement: Should children be legally made responsible to take care of their parents during their old age?

Arguments:

i. Yes. Such matter can only be solved by legal means.

ii. Yes. Only this will bring some relief to poor parents.

Answer: D. Neither I nor II is strongConcept: In Statement-and-Argument reasoning, an argument is 'strong' only when it is directly relevant to the statement and rests on a reasonable,…

  1. A.

    Only argument I is strong

  2. B.

    Only argument II is strong

  3. C.

    Either I or II is strong

  4. D.

    Neither I nor II is strong

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: D

Concept: In Statement-and-Argument reasoning, an argument is 'strong' only when it is directly relevant to the statement and rests on a reasonable, non-absolute basis; an argument built on an exclusive word like 'only' overstates its case and is usually weak, and a moral obligation cannot be validated by proposing legal compulsion as its sole remedy.

Application: Argument I claims legal means is the only way to solve the matter; Argument II claims legal compulsion is the only way to bring relief to parents. Both convert a moral duty (children caring for aging parents) into an exclusively legal question, and both rely on the absolute qualifier 'only' rather than a balanced, realistic case.

  • Claiming legal means is the only solution (argument I) ignores that a moral duty cannot be reliably enforced by law.

  • Claiming legal compulsion is the only way to bring relief to parents (argument II) confuses financial relief with genuine care.

  • Treating either of these absolute framings as valid repeats the same flaw of turning a moral duty into an exclusively legal fix.

Cross-check: If either argument were accepted, it would mean law alone can guarantee genuine filial care - but genuine care, unlike a contractual obligation, cannot be reliably compelled by legislation, so the absolute claim in each argument fails on its own terms.

Result: Neither argument I nor argument II is a strong argument.

Explore the full course: Nta Ugc Net Paper 1

Loading lesson…