Reasoning that begins with particular observations and arrives at a general…

Concept

Inductive and deductive reasoning are distinguished by the direction in which a conclusion is drawn.

Induction moves from particular observations to a broader generalization and yields a probable conclusion. Deduction moves from a general rule to a particular consequence and aims at necessity when its form is valid.

Application

The stem starts with particular statements and ends with a universal statement. This particular-to-general direction is the defining pattern of inductive reasoning.

Contrast

• Deductive reasoning proceeds from a general premise to a particular consequence.

• Abnormal reasoning is not a standard inferential category in introductory logic.

• Transcendental reasoning examines the conditions that make experience or knowledge possible in philosophical argument.

Cross-check

If the reasoning had started with a universal premise and applied it to a specific case, its direction would have been deductive. The stem gives the reverse direction.

Result

Therefore, the reasoning described is Inductive Reasoning.