Match each informal fallacy in List I with its category in List II. List I:…
2024
Match each informal fallacy in List I with its category in List II.
List I: Informal fallacy | List II: Category |
|---|---|
A. False cause | I. Relevance |
B. Appeal to emotion | II. Ambiguity |
C. Complex question | III. Defective induction |
D. Fallacy of composition | IV. Presumption |
Choose the correct matching from the options below.
Answer: B. A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II — ConceptInformal fallacies are classified by the kind of defect in reasoning: relevance, ambiguity, defective induction, or presumption. The classification…
- A.
A-IV, B-II, C-III, D-I
- B.
A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II
- C.
A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II
- D.
A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B
Concept
Informal fallacies are classified by the kind of defect in reasoning: relevance, ambiguity, defective induction, or presumption. The classification depends on the mechanism of the error, not merely on the topic of the argument.
Application
False cause infers a causal connection without adequate evidence, so it belongs to defective induction (III).
Appeal to emotion substitutes an emotional response for relevant reasons, so it belongs to relevance (I).
A complex question embeds an unproved assumption in the question, so it belongs to presumption (IV).
The fallacy of composition transfers a property of parts to the whole; this shift is classified under ambiguity (II).
Contrast
The mapping A-IV, B-II, C-III, D-I relocates every fallacy away from its standard category.
The mapping A-III, B-IV, C-I, D-II retains the classifications of false cause and composition but interchanges the categories of appeal to emotion and complex question.
The mapping A-II, B-I, C-IV, D-III retains the classifications of appeal to emotion and complex question but reassigns false cause and composition.
Cross-check
Informal fallacy | Category | Classification basis |
|---|---|---|
False cause | Defective induction (III) | An unsupported causal inference |
Appeal to emotion | Relevance (I) | Emotion replaces relevant evidence |
Complex question | Presumption (IV) | An unproved assumption is built into the question |
Fallacy of composition | Ambiguity (II) | A property is shifted from parts to the whole |
Therefore the required matching is A-III, B-I, C-IV, D-II.