If your students are identified as 'Unable but willing' in terms of their…
2020
If your students are identified as 'Unable but willing' in terms of their performance readiness level, which of the following methods of teaching will be considered appropriate to deal with them?
- A.
Giving challenging tasks during teaching
- B.
Providing scope for sharing responsibility and recognition
- C.
Mentoring and guiding with close supervision
- D.
Small step presentations with error free tasks and frequent reinforcement
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: C
Concept: Situational teaching matches each learner's development level — a combination of competence (can they do the task) and willingness (are they motivated/confident) — to a matching teaching style. Low competence with low willingness needs highly structured direction; low competence with high willingness needs close, hands-on direction paired with active encouragement (coaching); high competence with low willingness needs support that rebuilds confidence and ownership; high competence with high willingness allows independence.
Application: A student rated 'unable but willing' has low competence — the skill to do the task independently is not there yet — but high willingness, meaning motivation and enthusiasm are already present. This combination calls for coaching: the teacher must still give close, hands-on direction because the skill gap is real, while actively mentoring and encouraging, since the existing motivation should be nurtured rather than tested with independence it cannot yet handle. That is exactly mentoring and guiding with close supervision.
Contrast: each remaining option targets a different combination of competence and willingness:
Giving challenging tasks during teaching fits a learner who already has both the skill and the confidence to work independently — handing a still-developing learner a hard task assumes a competence that is not built yet, and difficulty alone will not build it.
Providing scope for sharing responsibility and recognition addresses low motivation in a learner who already has the skill — it does nothing for a learner whose real gap is competence, not motivation.
Small step presentations with error free tasks and frequent reinforcement fit a learner who is neither skilled nor motivated — the heavy reinforcement exists to build willingness from scratch, which an already-willing learner does not need.
Result: Mentoring and guiding with close supervision is the only option that closes the missing skill through direction while sustaining the motivation the learner already brings — matching the 'unable but willing' profile.