The passages given below are followed by a set of questions. Choose the most…
2025
The passages given below are followed by a set of questions. Choose the most appropriate answer to each question.
Not even a three-day brainstorming session among top psychologists at the Chinese university could unravel one of the world’s greatest puzzles- how the Chinese mind ticks. Michael Bond had reason to pace the pavement of the Chinese university campus last week. The psychologists who co-ordinated and moderated a three-day seminar in Chinese psychology and most of the participants came a long way to knock heads. “If a bomb hits this building,” muttered Bond, half-seriously, “it would wipe out the whole discipline.” But the only thing that went off in the cho yiu conference hall of Chinese university was the picking of brains, the pouring out of brains and a refrain from an ongoing mantra: “more work needs to be done” or “we don’t know”. Each of the 36 participants was allowed 30 minutes plus the use of an overhead projector to condense years of research into data and theories. Their content spilled over from twenty areas of Chinese behavior, including reading, learnings, psychopathology, social interaction, personality, and modernization.
An over ridding question for observers, however, was why, in this group of 21 Chinese and 15 non-Chinese, weren’t there more professionals from mainland China presenting research on the indigenous people.? Michael Philips, a psychiatrist who works in Hubei province, explained: “The cultural revolution silenced and froze the research,” said Canadian born doctor who has lived and worked in China for more than 10 years. “And 12 years later, research is underway but it is too early to have anything yet. Besides, most of the models being used are from the west anyway.” In such a specialist field, how can non-Chinese academics do research without possessing fluency in Chinese? Those who cannot read, write or speak the language usually team up with Chinese colleagues. “In ten years we won’t be able to do this. It’s a money thing”, said William Gabrenya, of Florida Institute of technology, who described himself as an illiterate gweilo who lags fluency in Chinese. He said that 93% of the non-Chinese authors in his field cannot read Chinese.
Dr. Gabrenya raised questions such as why is research dependant on all university students, why is research done on Chinese people in coastal cities?(Singapore, Taiwan, Shangai, and Hongkong) but not Inland? “Chinese psychology is so Confucian, too neat. He's been dead for a long time. How about the guy on a motorcycle in Taipei?” Dr. Gabrenya said urging that research has a more contemporary outlook. The academics came from Israel, Sweden, Taiwan, Singapore, US, British Columbia and of course HongKong. Many of the visual aides they used by way of illustration contained eye-squinting type and cobweb-like graphs. One speaker, a sociologist from Illinois even warned her colleagues that she would not give anyone enough time, to digest the long, skinny columns of numbers. Is Chinese intelligence different from western? For half of the audience who are illiterate in Chinese, Prof. Jimmy Chan of HKU examined each of the Chinese characters for intelligence. Phrases such as “A mind as fast as an arrow” and connections between strokes for sun and the moon were made.
After his 25 mins speech, Chan and the group lamented that using western tests is the only measure available to psychologists, who are starving for indigenous studies of Chinese by Chinese. How do Chinese children learn? David Kember of Hong Kong Polytechnic University zeroed in on deep learning versus surface. Deep is when the student is sincerely interested in his own reasons. The surface is memorizing and spitting out facts. It doesn’t nurture any deep understanding. If the language of instruction happens to be the children's second language, students in Hong Kong have all sorts of challenges with English speaking teachers from Australia, Britain, and America with accents and colloquialisms. Do Westerners have more self-esteem than Chinese? Dr. Leung Kwok, Chairman of the psychology department of a Chinese university, points his finger at belief systems: the collectivist's mindset often stereotypes Chinese unfairly.
The philosophy of YUEN( a concept used to explain good and bad events which are predetermined and out of the individual's control) does not foster a positive self-concept. Neither do collectivists beliefs, such as sacrifice for the group, compromise, and importance of using connections. “If a Chinese loses or fails, he has a stronger sense of responsibility. He tends to blame it on himself. A non-Chinese from the west may blame it on forces outside himself,” Dr. Leung said. By the end of the three-day session, there were as many questions raised as answered. It was agreed there was room for further research. To the laymen, so much of the discussion was foreign and riddled with jargon and ongoing references to studies and researches. The work of the participants will resurface in a forthcoming handbook of Chinese psychology, which will be edited by Dr.Bond and published by Oxford university press
According to the passage, all of the following are true except:
- A.
All of these
- B.
the visual aids were not tidy
- C.
the visual aids were not very easy to understand
- D.
the conference attracted a very professional standard of presentation
Attempted by 2 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: D
Concept: In an "all of the following are true EXCEPT" reading-comprehension question, each option must be checked against explicit statements in the passage. Three options will be directly supported by the text; exactly one will be unsupported or contradicted by it — that unsupported option is the answer.
Application: Checking each claim against the passage's own words:
The passage states the visual aids "contained eye-squinting type and cobweb-like graphs" — this directly confirms the aids were untidy/disorganised.
The same sentence, plus the sociologist warning colleagues she "would not give anyone enough time to digest the long, skinny columns of numbers," confirms the aids were hard to follow.
Nowhere does the passage describe the conference's presentation standard as polished or professional — the only concrete description of how material was presented (messy graphs, numbers colleagues couldn't digest in time) points the opposite way, so a claim of a "very professional standard of presentation" is not supported by the text.
Cross-check: Contrasting each statement against the passage:
"The visual aids were not tidy" — supported, matches "eye-squinting type and cobweb-like graphs."
"The visual aids were not very easy to understand" — supported, matches the warning about not having time to digest the number columns.
"All of these" — would only be correct if every statement about the conference matched the passage, but one statement (about presentation standard) does not.
"The conference attracted a very professional standard of presentation" — the only claim the passage's actual description of messy, hard-to-digest visual material does not back up, so this is the statement that is NOT true according to the passage.