Should the institute conduct classes in remote villages? Arguments: I. Yes,…
2024
Should the institute conduct classes in remote villages?
Arguments:
I. Yes, this will help those students who belong to villages and cannot visit urban ares for studies.
II. No, this is not an economically viable proposal, as the number of students who attend such classes cannot contribute to break-even.
- A.
if only argument I is strong.
- B.
if only argument II is strong.
- C.
if either I or II is strong.
- D.
If both I and II are strong.
Attempted by 13 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: D
Explanation:
Statement I: Conducting classes in remote villages helps students who cannot travel to urban areas for study. This is a strong social argument because it addresses access to education, equity, and the institute's mission to serve learners.
Statement II: Economic viability is a legitimate and strong consideration. The institute must consider costs, enrollment numbers, and sustainability; if running classes in remote villages is not financially sustainable, that affects the practicality of implementation.
Both arguments are relevant and strong for decision-making: one addresses social benefit, the other addresses financial feasibility.
Final decision: Because both accessibility and economic sustainability matter, both statements should be considered strong.