The chromatic number of a graph is the minimum number of colours used in a…
2024
The chromatic number of a graph is the minimum number of colours used in a proper colouring of the graph. Let 𝐺 be any graph with 𝑛 vertices and chromatic number 𝑘. Which of the following statements is/are always TRUE?
- A.
𝐺 contains a complete subgraph with 𝑘 vertices
- B.
𝐺 contains an independent set of size at least 𝑛/ 𝑘
- C.
𝐺 contains at least 𝑘(𝑘 − 1)/2 edges
- D.
𝐺 contains a vertex of degree at least 𝑘
Attempted by 83 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B, C
Correct statements: the graph contains an independent set of size at least n/ k; the graph contains at least k(k − 1)/2 edges.
Reasoning:
Independent set size at least n/k: In any proper k-colouring the vertex set is partitioned into k colour classes, each an independent set. By the pigeonhole principle at least one class has size at least n/k, so the graph contains an independent set of size ≥ n/k.
Edge lower bound k(k−1)/2: Every k-chromatic graph contains a k-critical subgraph (removing any edge lowers the chromatic number). In a k-critical graph every vertex has degree at least k−1. Hence the sum of degrees is at least k(k−1), so the number of edges in that subgraph is at least k(k−1)/2. Therefore the original graph has at least k(k−1)/2 edges.
Why a k-clique is not required: Chromatic number ≥ clique number, but equality need not hold. For example, the 5-cycle has chromatic number 3 but its largest clique has size 2, so a k-chromatic graph need not contain a complete subgraph on k vertices.
Why a vertex of degree at least k is not guaranteed: From the k-critical subgraph argument we only get minimum degree ≥ k−1, not ≥ k. The 5-cycle (chromatic number 3) has every vertex of degree 2 = k−1, so degree ≥ k is not guaranteed.
A video solution is available for this question — log in and enroll to watch it.