Consider a relation R(A, B, C, D, E, F) with the following functional…

Consider a relation R(A, B, C, D, E, F) with the following functional dependencies:
FDs = { A → C, BD → F, EF → A, D → B }
What is the minimum number of relations required to convert it into 3NF with lossless and dependency-preserving decomposition?

Answer: 4Step 1: Find Minimal Cover Given FDs: A→C, BD→F, EF→A, D→B Check BD→F: Compute D⁺: D → B (from D→B), so D⁺ = {D, B}. Then BD→F: since D⁺ already includes B, B…

Attempted by 16 students.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: 4

Step 1: Find Minimal Cover

Given FDs: A→C, BD→F, EF→A, D→B

Check BD→F:

Compute D⁺: D → B (from D→B), so D⁺ = {D, B}. Then BD→F: since D⁺ already includes B, B is extraneous in BD→F.

Thus, BD→F reduces to D → F.

Minimal cover becomes:

  • A → C

  • D → B

  • D → F

  • EF → A

Note: D → B and D → F can be combined into D → BF, but this is optional for synthesis.

Step 2: 3NF Synthesis (create relation for each FD)

  • From A→C → R1(A, C)

  • From D→BF → R2(D, B, F)

  • From EF→A → R3(E, F, A)

Step 3: Ensure a key appears in at least one relation

Find a key of R: Compute closure of DE.

D⁺ = {D, B, F} (from D→B, D→F), so DE⁺ = {D, E, B, F, A, C} = all attributes.

Thus, DE is a key.

No relation contains both D and E.

So add R4(D, E) to ensure lossless join and key presence.

Step 4: Verify dependency preservation

Check if all original FDs are preserved in the decomposition:

A→C: preserved in R1

BD→F: B and D are in R2, F is in R2 → preserved

EF→A: E and F in R3, A in R3 → preserved

D→B: D and B in R2 → preserved

All FDs are preserved.

Final Answer: Minimum number of relations = 4

Relations:

  • R1(A, C)

  • R2(D, B, F)

  • R3(E, F, A)

  • R4(D, E)

Explore the full course: Gate Guidance By Sanchit Sir

Loading lesson…