Statements: 1. The government has decided to make all the information related…
2024
Statements:
1. The government has decided to make all the information related to primary education available to the general public.
2. In the past, the general public did not have access to all this information related to primary education.
- A.
Statement I is the cause and statement II is its effect
- B.
Statement II is the cause and statement I is its effect
- C.
Both the statements I and II are independent causes
- D.
Both the statements I and II are effects of independent causes
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B
Concept: In cause-and-effect statement questions, the task is to determine the temporal and logical relationship between the two statements: one statement may describe a state of affairs that existed before and directly explains why the other statement's event or decision took place — that preceding, explanatory statement is the cause, and the statement describing the resulting action is its effect. The two statements are not independent causes unless each is triggered by a wholly separate, unstated factor, and they are not both effects of a common cause unless neither statement explains the other.
Application: Here, the second statement describes a pre-existing condition — in the past, the general public lacked access to information related to primary education. The first statement describes a subsequent decision — the government has now decided to make that information available. The action in the first statement is a direct response to the gap described in the second statement: an administration identifies a shortfall in public awareness/access and then acts to close it. So the situation in the second statement precedes and explains the decision in the first statement.
Cross-check against each alternative:
Reversing the direction (treating the government's decision as the cause of the past lack of access) does not fit the timeline: the past condition described already existed before the decision was taken, and an effect cannot precede its own cause.
Reading the two statements as independent, unrelated causes ignores that the second statement specifically names the very problem the first statement's action addresses — they are directly linked, not standalone events.
Concluding both statements are effects of a separate, unstated cause requires an outside triggering event that the passage never supplies; the two statements are directly connected to each other, with no need to posit a common external cause.
So the described past deficiency is the cause, and the government's decision to make the information public is the effect that follows from it.