Statement: To reduce increasing air pollution levels in major cities, the…

2025

Statement: To reduce increasing air pollution levels in major cities, the government has decided to impose stricter emission norms for vehicles. Which of the following is an assumption implicit in this decision?

Answer: B. Vehicular emissions are a significant contributor to rising pollution levels.ConceptAn assumption is an unstated premise that must be true for a decision or argument to hold. The standard test is negation: deny the candidate premise;…

  1. A.

    Air pollution can be completely eliminated by emission norms.

  2. B.

    Vehicular emissions are a significant contributor to rising pollution levels.

  3. C.

    Citizens will willingly adopt cleaner alternatives without resistance.

  4. D.

    Industrial pollution is not responsible for poor air quality in cities.

  5. E.

    None of these.

Attempted by 12 students.

Show answer & explanation

Correct answer: B

Concept

An assumption is an unstated premise that must be true for a decision or argument to hold. The standard test is negation: deny the candidate premise; if the decision would no longer make sense once the premise is denied, the premise was assumed by the decision.

Application

Denying “vehicular emissions are a significant contributor to rising pollution levels” gives “vehicular emissions are not a significant contributor” — that is, their share of the rising pollution is negligible. Under that denial, stricter vehicle-emission norms could not meaningfully reduce the “increasing air pollution levels” the decision explicitly targets, because curbing a negligible source does not meaningfully move the overall trend. In that case, imposing stricter vehicle-emission norms as the government's response to rising pollution would not achieve its stated purpose, so this specific measure would not make sense as a solution to the stated problem. Because denying this premise removes any reason to expect the decision to work, the decision is built on this premise. A smaller-but-still-meaningful contributor would not falsify the assumption; only a negligible one would.

Cross-check

  • Denying that pollution can be completely eliminated by emission norms still leaves the decision intact, because reducing pollution, not eliminating it outright, is the stated goal; this stronger claim is not required.

  • Denying that citizens will willingly adopt cleaner alternatives also does not undermine the decision, because the norms are imposed directly on vehicles and their manufacturers, independent of voluntary citizen behaviour.

  • Denying that industrial pollution is not responsible for poor air quality still leaves the decision standing, because multiple pollution sources can coexist and the decision does not require industrial pollution to be blameless.

  • Since exactly one premise fails to hold up under denial while the other candidate statements do not, the residual "none of these" choice does not apply here.

Explore the full course: Sbi Clerk Mains

Loading lesson…