Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four…
2023202420232023
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by three or four arguments numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' arguments) and which is/are 'weak' arguments) and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
Statement: Should there be a complete ban on manufacture and use of firecrackers?
Arguments:
i. No. This will render thousands of workers jobless.
ii. Yes. The firecracker manufacturers use child labour to a large extent.
iii. Yes. This will be a concrete step to reduce noise and air pollution.
iv. No. Use of firecrackers makes certain special occasions more lively and joyful.
- A.
Only I and II are strong
- B.
Only I and III are strong
- C.
Only III and IV are strong
- D.
Only I, II and III are strong
Attempted by 59 students.
Show answer & explanation
Correct answer: B
Answer: Only I and III are strong
Explanation:
Argument I is strong: a complete ban on manufacture and use would likely make many workers in the firecracker industry unemployed, so the economic impact is a valid concern.
Argument III is strong: firecrackers produce loud noise and air pollutants; banning them would be an effective step to reduce both noise and air pollution.
Argument II is weak: child labour is a serious issue, but it can be addressed through enforcement of labour laws, inspection, and rehabilitation programs without necessarily shutting down the whole industry.
Argument IV is weak: while firecrackers may add to celebrations, there are many alternative ways to make occasions lively that avoid the health and environmental harms caused by firecrackers.